Mayuka Aikawa vs Jing-Jing Lu Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Analyzing the recent performance metrics, Lu and Aikawa exhibit variances in key tennis stats that can greatly influence the outcome of their match. Over the past six months, Lu has secured 37.33% of points on their second serve, whereas Aikawa has achieved a higher percentage, winning 41.82%. This second serve performance is closely linked with predicting match outcomes. Observing return game statistics during this period, Lu demonstrates a superior return, winning 58.38% of their opponent's second serve points, compared to Aikawa's 44.44%. When comparing first serve return stats, Lu again holds the advantage with a 38.07% success rate over Aikawa's 33.37%.

A key aspect of a player's resilience is how they perform under pressure. Lu has exhibited the ability to save 44.95% of breakpoints in recent form, slightly outperforming Aikawa, who has managed to save 41.97% of such points. This statistic is particularly valuable for in-game betting predictions. When reviewing their overall performance over the last year, Lu has a win rate of 50% from a 20-20 win-loss record. In contrast, Aikawa surpasses this figure with a win percentage of 55.93%, reflecting a record of 33 wins against 26 losses.

The analysis of surface performance reveals that Lu fares best on grass with a 57% win rate, while Aikawa shines on indoor hard courts, boasting a win percentage of 67%. Conversely, Lu's weakest surface is clay with a 51% win rate, whereas Aikawa has struggled on grass, failing to secure a win (0%). Over the past year, Lu has competed primarily in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, earning a 50% match win rate. Aikawa, having competed mostly in similar events, has a superior win rate of 58.7%.

Opponent quality is another consideration, with Lu facing players averaging a rank of 382.8, while Aikawa's opponents have an average rank of 385.36. Should the match progress to a deciding set, Lu's performance appears to dip, securing only 18% of these scenarios over the past year, whereas Aikawa maintains a consistent 50% win rate in deciding sets. Additionally, when it comes to converting breakpoints in their recent form, Lu again edges out Aikawa with a conversion rate of 39.89% compared to 37.6%.

Taking into account these detailed statistics and correlations with historical performance indicators, Aikawa's edge in several key areas, such as second serve points, overall match win rate, and deciding set victories, suggests that Aikawa may have the upper hand in their forthcoming match against Lu.